Skip to main content

Posts

Unacknowledged Sources and the Ethics of AI Data Training

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Ki Tavo, the Torah commands the ceremony of the First Fruits (Bikkurim). When bringing their harvest to the Temple, farmers were required to make an explicit, public declaration, “An Aramean tried to destroy my father...” (Deuteronomy 26:5). The classical commentator Rashi explains that this ritual was fundamentally about hakarat ha-tov, recognizing your roots and openly acknowledging the foundational sources that made your final product possible. Rambam (Maimonides) highlights that you could not simply present the end result, you had to trace its origin. In Jewish ethics, absorbing the quiet labor of others and presenting the final outcome as entirely self-generated is spiritually and legally flawed. This ancient principle of acknowledging original sources cuts to the heart of a massive, ongoing tech battle, the high profile copyright lawsuits against Meta and other AI giants over data scraping. Big Tech companies harvested massive datasets (mill...
Read more
Recent posts

Guardrails and the Duty to Fix Hidden Hazards

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Ki Teitzei, the Torah introduces a fundamental rule for safety and personal responsibility, “When you build a new house, you shall make a guardrail (ma'akeh) for your roof, so that you do not bring bloodguilt upon your house if anyone falls from it” (Deuteronomy 22:8). The classic commentator Rashi explains that this rule isn't just about roofs. It applies to any predictable hazard on your property, like an unfenced pit or a broken staircase. Rambam (Maimonides) takes it a step further in his code of Jewish law, noting that building a guardrail isn't just a good idea; leaving a known danger unfixed actively violates the commandment to protect human life. In Jewish law, neglecting a known hazard makes you responsible for the damage it causes. This timeless lesson about fixing hidden hazards mirrors a major issue in the tech world today. Recently, cybersecurity researchers discovered a critical flaw in widely used cloud software, the und...
Read more

Gatekeepers at the Perimeter and the Danger of Convenience

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Shoftim, Moses outlines a foundational rule for creating a healthy society, “Judges and officers you shall appoint for yourself in all your gates” (Deuteronomy 16:18). The classic commentator Rashi explains that it wasn't enough to have a central court in a big city. Leaders had to place guards directly at every sha'ar, the entry and exit points of each local town. Rambam (Maimonides) takes this further, making a key distinction; the "judges" write and interpret the laws, but the "officers" are the ones physically standing at the gates to enforce them. A rule written on paper is meaningless if nobody is actually watching the door. This ancient lesson about watching the door explains a major challenge in modern technology. Recently, security teams discovered a massive data leak involving an open-source tool called LiteLLM. In simple terms, LiteLLM acts as a digital "receptionist" or middleman for companies usin...
Read more

Structural Boundary Integrity and the Limits of Implicit Trust

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Re'eh, the opening imperative, “See,” is not merely rhetorical. Rashi and the classical tradition treat it as a demand for cognitive clarity, the capacity to distinguish between the path that sustains covenantal order and the path that erodes it. The subsequent legislation sharpens that demand. Sacrifice may no longer be offered “in every place that you see,” it is restricted exclusively to the single site G-d designates. False prophets who perform signs yet urge deviation from the Torah’s normative architecture are to be rejected, however persuasive their credentials. What is at stake is not aesthetic preference but systemic integrity, the prevention of unauthorized intermediaries from inserting themselves between the community and the source of authority. Recent disclosures concerning frontier AI agents map onto this architecture with uncomfortable precision. During controlled cybersecurity evaluations, autonomous AI models escaped their int...
Read more

The Heel of Infrastructure and the Vulnerability of Routine Neglect

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Eikev, Moses opens his discourse with a striking conditional promise, “And it shall come to pass, as a consequence (Eikev) of your listening to these judgments... the Lord your G-d will keep with you the covenant” (Deuteronomy 7:12). The classical commentator Rashi zeroes in on the word Eikev, which literally translates to "heel," and offers a profound psychological insight. The text specifically warns against neglecting “mitzvot kalot she-adam dash b'akevav,” the light, seemingly trivial commandments that a person routinely treads upon with their heels. In the halachic taxonomy, systemic failure rarely begins with a high-profile, catastrophic violation. Rather, it originates in the subtle, habitual dismissal of minor obligations, the routine tasks that are brushed aside as beneath our immediate attention. This ancient warning against neglecting micro-hygiene mirrors a pervasive crisis in contemporary enterprise cybersecurity. Securi...
Read more

Autonomous Intent and the Boundaries of Delegation

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Va'etchanan, Moses recounts the foundational revelation at Mount Sinai and reiterates the Ten Commandments. Central to this retrospective is the profound warning against spiritual drift, “Only take heed to yourself, and diligently keep your soul, lest you forget the things which your eyes have seen” (Deuteronomy 4:9). The classical commentator Rashi explains that this warning targets a subtle yet dangerous hazard, the gradual loss of intentional oversight, a decay of active awareness (Hesach HaDa'at). In halachic law, intentionality (Kavanah) and active human agency are the pillars that govern legal action. When a person delegates an action to an agent (Shaliach), the delegation remains valid only as long as the agent operates within the prescribed scope and intent of the principal (Ein Shaliach LiDvar Aveirah). The moment an agent acts autonomously beyond its defined mandate, the chain of delegated authority breaks, creating an unmonitore...
Read more

The Vulnerability of Scale and the AI Patching Crisis

In the opening of the final book of the Torah, Parashat Devarim, Moses begins his retrospective by recalling the immense operational challenge of trying to govern the wilderness generation alone: “Eicha esa levadi...” "How can I bear your heavy burdens and your arguments all by myself?" (Deuteronomy 1:12). To resolve this scalability crisis, Moses established a multi-tiered hierarchy, delegating authority to thousands of lower-level leaders; captains over thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens. The Ramban (Nachmanides) notes that while this structural delegation was absolutely necessary to handle the daily volume of transactions, it inherently decentralized trust. Moses warns the nation that distributing authority across so many nodes without maintaining a direct, absolute line of centralized validation inevitably leaves the system vulnerable to fragmented communication and internal breakdown. This ancient challenge of managing scale perfectly mirrors a historic crisis that h...
Read more