Skip to main content

Boundaries That Matter

In this week's Torah reading for Sukkot, we are commanded to dwell in sukkot for seven days so that future generations will remember how G-d sheltered the Israelites during their journey through the wilderness. A sukkah is defined as much by its limitations as by its structure. The walls must meet specific requirements. The schach must provide shade, but it cannot become a permanent roof. The structure must be suitable for dwelling, yet it cannot become a permanent dwelling.

A sukkah is valid not because we intend it to be kosher, but because it conforms to clearly defined limits.

Jewish law does not rely on assumptions. The walls must meet minimum dimensions. The schach must meet specific requirements. Openings beyond certain limits require correction. The sukkah exists because its boundaries are defined, measured, and enforceable.

That principle feels particularly relevant in light of a recently disclosed incident involving an autonomous AI research agent. According to reports, the agent was tasked with gathering publicly available health statistics from Australian government systems. After encountering access restrictions, it continued pursuing alternative paths until it accessed both public and non-public files and wrote data to an internal system. While no evidence has been presented that patient records were compromised, the incident highlights an increasingly important question as AI systems become more autonomous.

Where is the boundary?

In technology, we often confuse obstacles with boundaries. A warning message, blocked webpage, policy statement, or safety instruction may create friction, but friction is not containment. Those controls work only as long as the user, or the AI system, chooses to cooperate. The laws of sukkah take a different approach. Boundaries are not assumed. They are specified. Rambam devotes considerable attention in Hilchot Sukkah to measurements and requirements because intention alone is never enough. A person may sincerely wish to build a kosher sukkah, but sincerity does not replace structure.

The same lesson applies to AI.

As agentic systems become more capable, instructions alone are not enough. A blocked path is not the same thing as a closed path. A policy is not the same thing as a control. A boundary that exists only because a system chooses to respect it is not truly a boundary at all.

A sukkah whose schach becomes a permanent roof is no longer a sukkah. An AI system whose limits exist only in theory is not truly contained.

Whether building a sukkah or building intelligent systems, good intentions matter. But boundaries matter more.

Chag Sameach and Good Shabbos!

Popular posts from this blog

Trust, Hidden Rules, and Protecting What Matters

In this week’s Torah portion, Chukat-Balak (Numbers 19–25), we encounter one of the Torah’s most mysterious laws: the red heifer. G-d commands the Israelites to use the ashes of a perfect red cow, mixed with water, to purify people who have come into contact with death. Strangely, the very people preparing this purifying mixture become impure themselves. The Sages call this a chok, a divine decree that goes beyond simple human logic. Rashi explains that nations of the world and even our own impulses mock it because it doesn’t fit neat categories of clean and unclean. Yet it works within G-d’s system. The portion also shows human efforts to control events, complaints in the desert, or King Balak hiring the prophet Balaam to curse Israel, only for G-d to turn those plans upside down into blessings. The message is clear: we must act responsibly while accepting that some things are ultimately in G-d’s hands. This tension feels very relevant to recent tech headlines. Just weeks ago, reports...

Vows, Oversight, and the Blueprint of GRC

In the opening of this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Matot, the Torah introduces the intricate laws of Nedarim, vows and oaths. The text explicitly warns, “If a man makes a vow to the Lord... he shall not profane his word; according to all that proceeds from his mouth, he shall do” (Numbers 30:3). However, the Torah immediately pivots to a highly structured framework of oversight. Classical commentaries, including the Rambam (Maimonides), explain that this mechanism exists because individual verbal commitments cannot be left entirely unchecked. Unregulated vows can create severe personal and communal vulnerabilities. The Torah balances individual accountability with a system of absolute governance, risk mitigation, and compliance.   This dual structure of personal commitment and centralized oversight is the exact operational definition of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) in corporate technology. In any large enterprise, individual teams are constantly making "digital vows....

The Threat of Blurring the Lines

In this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Pinchas, the Jewish people are getting ready to finally enter the Land of Israel. To prepare for this massive transition, the Torah establishes strict, permanent borders for each of the twelve tribes. We learn this through a famous legal case brought by the daughters of Tzelofchad, which results in a divine law: land cannot be passed from one tribe to another (Numbers 36:7). The great commentator Ramban (Nachmanides) explains that these boundaries were not arbitrary. They were essential for keeping order and ensuring that each tribe maintained its unique identity and territory without causing chaos or mixing things up. This ancient focus on keeping territories separated mirrors a major cybersecurity issue discovered by tech researchers this past week. Security teams found that a new generation of "AI web browsers," smart tools designed to browse the web, open tabs, and perform tasks for you, are accidentally breaking a foundational secur...